🔗 Share this article

Whenever a prominent awards ceremony approaches, you'll find a demand for introducing of new categories to recognize underappreciated efforts and fill the spirits of fans dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator made the case advocating for terror-themed awards. That would be fantastic. The same goes for strategy board titles, which is a dedicated supporter's campaign. Yet I need to apologize in advance when I prioritize since similar to single-minded supporters, there's a strong justification for why my demand remains most pressing above others. The demand is this: We need a category for puzzle games.

Categorizing Game Types

Categorizing art by genre isn't exact; it’s very subjective, and typically spark debates resulting in unclear classifications. It's understandable that movie academies don’t do it. However, it represents an essential concession for the industry of interactive entertainment, that demonstrate such variety they hardly constitute a single creative category.

For the full spectrum of interactive entertainment excellence to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to have a chance for representation, specific award classifications remain vital.

Present Award Structure

The major gaming awards presently include classifications covering Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these classifications successfully include numerous genres, and you can find room for most games within them.

Different situation exists for puzzle games. No appropriate category exists to accommodate them. Think about these outstanding current releases, showing diverse approaches: building puzzles of one title, fast-paced pattern recognition from another release, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles from additional release. Where could they possibly go within current classifications? Unfortunately, nowhere.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers launched regularly that have no home at major award shows, except when they manage to fit award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive Indie races.

• One classic puzzle game received no recognition completely that year
• Another creative title received no nominations during that ceremony
• A beloved organization game got ignored recently
• Limited numbers of puzzle games managed to sneak into small studio or handheld classifications

Value of Brain-Teasers

Frequently they represent small games, however the design in brain-teasers carries substantial weight. Iconic mobile puzzle games count as most engaged experiences in the world continuing this trend for an extended period.

The legendary block-stacking game competes with popular creative games competing to become most purchased experience; it additionally competes for best game of all time. Puzzle games are foundational for gaming as medium, and engaging with almost every other genre.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Puzzle games wouldn’t have such difficulty. You could fill five nominees interesting, varied, worthy titles annually without trouble — perhaps, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave many worthy titles.

Restating the point, these represent titles lacking appropriate categories in important events. Puzzle game makers are working at the hard edge of video game design, developing some of most fundamental forms of gaming itself. Comparable to cinema stunt performers, they merit acknowledgment. Let’s not keep them waiting 35 years.